Rss Feed

Grab the RSS feed

What's RSS? What's RSS?

Or subscribe by email:

Time for a mea culpa minute

June 20th, 2008 | by Scott

It appears that you're new here, if you like what you read, please subscribe to the news feed or sign up for the Leap eTips news and updates email list. Thank you for visiting :)

It seems that with some recent postings I’ve given the impression to at-least one person who emailed me that I may feel negatively towards all marketers in the “make money online” market, or achieve such titles as super-affiliate and guru among their followers.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Without going back and rereading all of my postings I’m pretty sure that any time I’ve used a negative tone it was directed specifically at those who have never earned an honest paycheck with Internet Marketing themselves, yet try to carve out a niche teaching others how to do it. These are the “blind leading the blind” so-to-speak that I have no use or respect for.

I do know that I specifically mentioned Frank Kern and Yaro Starak in a recent posting, but that wasn’t with a negative tone or comment towards either of them in any way. I was saying in that post that people new to Internet Marketing shouldn’t be trying to become one of those guys without first learning how to make money for themselves in other markets. It’s like someone with 1 day of medical school calling themselves a Brain Surgeon.

To be clear, I don’t know Frank or Yaro personally, but I’ve seen a lot of what they’ve done in the past… I’ve even learned some things by watching what they’ve done, and I absolutely respect their abilities to build profitable projects. Heck, I’ve even linked to Yaro’s blog in the past here as a resource for others to check out.

My own resume includes a wide variety of markets that I’ve had great success in, ranging from fish breeding to clothing. From web services to ski equipment to software development and numerous other markets in between. I’ve had software applications that I created purchased outright and rebranded by larger distribution companies, and I’ve created custom applications for businesses as far back as 1998 that companies are still using today. I’ve filled the underwear drawers and wardrobes of over 10,000 customers since 1995 with everything from hosiery to custom printed T-shirts to suit coats.

But I think that’s part of the problem that allows for noobs to easily enter and often screw up and give a bad rap to the honest folks in the make money online industry. Looking at some of my background which I’ve just posted I can tell you that only a handful of people know my name is associated with any of those things.

The majority of people who have seen or heard my name associate it with “the guy who wrote that book on minisites”, or maybe with article marketing and the Content Caboodle project, or they think of me as some guy with a blog about online marketing…

And the same is true for most of those well-known online marketers too. They (most of them) didn’t start out teaching other people how to make money online–they started out by making money themselves and then later realized the knowledge they had acquired was of value to newcomers.

Some of them freely share what they know, some of them create products to sell from what they know, and most–like myself–tend to combine a healthy mixture of freely sharing some of their experience and knowledge with earning profits from selling some of their experience and knowledge.

I think that’s absolutely reasonable as the knowledge of folks who’ve actually “done it” themselves certainly has value and their time for putting that knowledge into a written form or videos or whatever is worth something too.

So, how do you tell the difference between people who know what they’re talking about and the fakers?

It can be hard, like I said there’s very few people who know of my involvement in my most lucrative markets and sites. And it isn’t because I’m sneaky or malicious, it’s because I don’t need to be in the way of my customers and the products they want. I’m selling products and services in those markets, not myself; so customers don’t want or need to know my name out there. It doesn’t improve their experience or life, and it doesn’t help me make a sale…so of course I stay completely out of the way.

In fact, Heather (who has a retail background like me) often refers to this as “playing stockboy”. Customers enter your store and want to find the item they’re looking for on the shelf, they want a fast checkout and they want to leave. They don’t want to know the name of the stockboy who filled the shelves, and they certainly don’t want to hold a conversation with the stockboy before, during or after their visit to the store.

There’s also the competition factor. When you find a good market and learn the ins-and-outs of that customer base, the last thing you want to do is advertise openly to other marketers who know you where you’re focusing your attentions right now. That would be like a football team giving their playbook to the opponents before every game.

I don’t even mention what general markets I’m in most of the time until after I’ve either secured my project at the top of that market or I’ve made my money and already left the market.

Still, if you pay attention it shouldn’t be too hard to determine who is straight-shooting with you and who is bull-crapping their way through it.

First, there’s a bit of a personal connection that happens online when you spend time interacting and reading the writings of anyone long enough. And if you feel like there isn’t something right about somebody, then there probably isn’t and you should be suspicious of what they’re feeding you.

But even more telling, in my opinion, is what methods and advice someone is dishing out. The fakers who haven’t done it for themselves always reach a wall where they no longer know what to say next to the people following them.

They’ll begin to wing it and start contradicting things they’ve said before, or worse they’ll move into pushing black-hat methods because they just don’t know where else to go. My advice is when you notice these things, run away and keep running…

The mea culpa

So, while I will try to make my comments more clear in the future I just wanted to post this and say that when I’ve spoken–or do speak–with disregard of so-called gurus and make money online marketers, it is the Joe Blows who have never earned an honest dollar for themselves online that I’m referring to.

And there are far too many of these goofs out there already, which is why I often try to steer the readers here on my blog away from the “make money online” niche when they’re just starting out.

If you haven’t proven yourself in other markets, you shouldn’t be dispensing advice to others on how to do it. That’s my position.


Email this post Email this post

Technorati Tags: , ,

Also See:

Stumble It!



  1. 8 Responses to “Time for a mea culpa minute”

  2. By Scott on Jun 20, 2008 | Reply

    Another mea culpa is due…

    I listed several bullet points of my online marketing resume in this posting and referred to them as my own accomplishments. However, the truth is that without the assistance and support of Heather, Chrissy and Roberta (listed in no specific order) none of these would have been possible and I’d still be lingering in “what to do” land without each of them.

    :) So, “my fault” guys.

  3. By chris on Jun 20, 2008 | Reply

    Hey Scott, how do you think not disclosing about us and contact us info squares with Google’s Transparency guidelines which they publish in their Adwords training center under their Quality section: http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=46675&ctx=sibling

    While I realize that the section relates to PPC, I was wondering if you think Google might be applying the same standards for SER. Any thoughts?

  4. By Scott on Jun 20, 2008 | Reply

    Chris, in general I absolutely agree with the idea of transparency. But I also think there are situations and circumstances which should dictate how candid and transparent a business is as well, because there’s a line between providing necessary information and tooting your own horn.

    If you insert cookies, collect data and etc., you should make that information available in your Privacy Policy along with details of how these things will be used.

    On disclosing business information, G’s terms say you should “openly share information about your business and what it does”.

    I’d say it’s up to the business to decide what reasonably needs to be shared and what doesn’t in each situation. If you run an affiliate site that promotes Amazon.com products does your name have to be disclosed there?–or is it reasonable to simply inform visitors that they will be interacting with Amazon.com while visiting YOURDOMAIN.com in your privacy policy?

    If you run AdSense on your sites that’s exactly what you have to tell your site visitors in your PP according to G’s updated TOS. So, I’d say that’s a reasonable line in some situations.

    In many cases we stay under the radar because that’s better for everyone, including our visitors and customers who couldn’t care less about us; only what we can do for them.

    A bloated about page with a company history and bio’s for each associate serves no purpose beyond ego stroking in some cases, I hate having to waste time scanning them on sites myself when I’m really just looking for a brief blurb that informs me of who and how to make contact if I need to.

    There are toll-free phone numbers and mailing addresses available on nearly every web site I’ve ever been involved with. It’s just good for business to do so. But my name and mug-shot doesn’t always appear with prominent placement because it simply doesn’t need to.

    As for G’s points about honoring the deals you make and only charging for the products or services you provide… those are no-brainers to me. Of course you should follow those rules if you want to stay in business more than a day.

    As for whether or not G’s applying the same standards to index listings as their PPC offerings, you’d have to ask them, and despite their posted positions on being “open” with information, I doubt they’re going to tell you.

    If I had to guess–and that’s just what I’d be doing, guessing–I’d say there’s probably some SERPs weight being given to sites that have clear Privacy Policies, AUP and TOS pages, and maybe even About pages too, though I would doubt that since they’re often nothing more than an expression of vanity rather than informative to visitors.

  5. By lissie on Jun 20, 2008 | Reply

    I noticed u made an intelligent point over at Caroline’s blog re that most money is not in the MMO niche. Can I point u over 2 bloggerunleashed.com - I think u will find that Vic is articulating what u are starting to suspect

  6. By Scott on Jun 21, 2008 | Reply

    Starting to suspect? I’ve been doing this stuff since 1995 and would say that over the last 12.5 years 99.9% of my accumulated income came from outside the “make money online” markets.

    Vic is a bit of a tool, but since you said my points were “intelligent” I’ll play nice. :)

    Actually, I’m joking with the tool comment and hope if it gets back to Vic he’ll realize that and laugh it off. Otherwise he’ll probably post a “F@c& Scott Bannon” video response and drive up my traffic.

    Seriously though, some of his methods are too gray-area for me but I’m sure he’s making a killing with them and respect that.

    I’ve even linked to his blog in the past because for anyone interested in Bans or Bookmarking Demon stuff I think he’s among the top goto guys to follow. You just have to get passed his ghetto mannerisms.

  7. By Mitchell Allen on Jun 21, 2008 | Reply

    Scott, well, if you can apologize, so can I. I responded to a comment you made in Caroline Middlebrook’s blog (Do You Really Want to be RICH?).
    I certainly didn’t mean to insinuate that savvy marketers exploit unsuspecting consumers.
    After reading your post, I felt bad for even putting that out there. I didn’t want to hijack her post blathering on about ethics and whatnot - she does a good job covering that topic on her own:) - but I just wanted to let you know that the comment was not meant to be a jab, merely part of the bigger question.

    Cheers,

    Mitch

  8. By Scott on Jun 21, 2008 | Reply

    Mitch, no worries from my end and while I appreciate the thought, there’s no need for an apology at all.

    Your points and questions are honest, and I know there are people who view marketers as immoral and unethical at best.

    That view is deserved by some, but by no means all of us in my opinion. Still, I don’t get in a huff when I or all marketers are perceived that way, I just let the conversation proceed and offer the best information I can. What others take away from it is up to them.

  9. By dee on Jun 22, 2008 | Reply

    Marketers need to be thick-skinned. No need to take to heart what anybody else thinks or says. You know what you are doing - Right or wrong.

Post a Comment

retaggr