Archive for February, 2010

My Google Reader Shares – February 27, 2010

Saturday, February 27th, 2010

Email this post Email this post

Technorati Tags: ,

1 Part Developer, 1 Part Marketer, 1 Part Domainer-Shaken and Stirred

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

I rarely talk about the domaining part of my business, but it actually is a fairly large portion of what I do and what any busy online marketer or developer does, so I figured today was a good time to discuss it and see if I could offer anything of value for you from my experiences.

I have to preface this by saying I don’t buy domains purely as investments that I intend to resell later at a higher price.

I know that’s a business model for some who like to speculate on domains like they were stocks. That’s not my thing though, I’m a tinkerer and a builder, I like to create, even in the virtual space, so when I buy domains it’s because I believe they will have value to me on a project, not because I think someone else might want them later on down the road.

I rarely sell domains, in fact I don’t think I’ve sold a single one in the last 2 years. In-fact, I recently just listed a couple I’ve had unused for sale over at NamePros and after 2 days I realize that I have no clue what the domaining market really looks like these days.

These are “CityName”Pizza.com geo-service domains that I purchased last year for a marketing campaign I was launching to promote the CPA offer of a national pizza chain. Unfortunately, the pizza chain shut down their CPA offer really quickly and without warning, so I was stuck with these extra domains that hadn’t been used yet.

They’re great domains if you own a pizza shop in any of the cities. Imagine if you own a small pizza shop in a medium size city like Erie, PA, and you could have EriePizza.com as your domain…list yourself with Google local and you could literally own the online market there. So for domainers who know the ins-and-outs of selling domains like these to end users (like pizza shop owners in the named cities), these should hold some value.

Or if you’re a web developer, you could easily place some content about the cities and pizza on the domain and then monetize the traffic with advertising. Even just using AdSense I figure the domains would pull in a few dollars per month each, and since I’m offering the domains for just about registration fees I thought for sure they would be gobbled up quick. (If they don’t sell, this is likely what I’ll do with them at some point down the road, just because I don’t have the time to chase end user sales)

Yet, 2 days after listing them I haven’t had a single offer or even comment. I’m not sure if domainers are becoming too lazy to take domains like these and go after the end user sales or what. I did look through the listings that were generating offers and sales on the boards at NamePros and what strikes me is that a lot of names which have no true apparent value at all, other than a pointless Google pagerank of 1 or more, seem to get the most traction.

I understand that mentality on forums that are more about webmasters and developers, they often buy pagerank domains just to sell links from and make a quick profit until Google strips the ranking off of the domains for link selling, but I didn’t expect to see so much attention given to pagerank on a domaining forum. It just shows how little attention I pay to the domaining market even though I do a lot of domain buying.

My Domain Portfolio

I’m not sure of the actual number of domains I own right now off-hand, but it’s a lot. By a lot I mean I purchase anywhere from 1 to 4 dozen (and sometimes more) domains almost monthly, and I’ve been doing that for years.

Some I buy for new projects, but most I buy for marketing value with existing projects. And in these instances, it’s usually dropped domains (domains that somebody owned and then let expire without renewing the registration) that I buy, because they sometimes have an extra little value of some established backlinks or traffic associated with them.

A Purchasing Example

Here’s an example of how and why I do this. Let’s say that I have an ecommerce site where I’m selling Baby Strollers (I don’t have such a site, this is a hypothetical example). That’s bad for marketers because we want to get our pages ranked as high as possible. After all, better rankings means more traffic, and typically more revenue.

A lot of marketers (myself included at times) will simply put more efforts into link building, PPC and other whitehat methods to try and improve our product page listings in the search engines. And some will go over the line into the realm of blackhat link building, though I strongly urge everyone to avoid doing that.

So, here’s what I’m facing in my hypothetical situation: It’s hard to get my product sales pages to rank well against established retailers like Amazon and Wal-Mart, but I need more traffic if I want to earn a fair living from my site…

And that’s where dropped domains come in for me. Since my site is about Baby Strollers, I’ll watch the dropped domains listings for anything baby stroller related and that doesn’t violate any trademarks. Sure, it would be great if Baby.com opened up (but don’t hold your breath for such a find), but I’ll take any long-tail domain that comes along if the keyword phrase gets any sort of monthly search traffic and the term has little competition.

Playing Detective

So let’s say I see the domain FastFoldingStroller.com is available. I’ll go on over to Google and check the monthly search volume for “fast folding stroller”, “fast folding strollers”, “folding stroller” and “folding strollers”

If 1 or more of the terms is getting 200 searches per month or more I’m half way to deciding to purchase the domain.

Next, I’ll check Google for the amount of competition for those same terms, as well as check out the top listed sites for each to judge the strength of that competition.

There’s software out there that’s supposed to be able to do all of this for you, but I’m Old-School and like doing the investigative legwork manually. I told you I was a tinkerer.

After looking over the competition, if I believe that I can rank well for the term without too much investment, then I’ve got a winner and head straight to the nearest registrar to grab up the domain.

Then, depending on what I believe the “user intent” of people going to that domain would be, I’ll either put up an informational landing page on it with links directing any possible buying traffic to my ecommerce pages. Or, if it’s a phrase where I feel the user intent is already to make a purchase, as it would likely be with a domain like FastFoldingStroller.com – then I may simply point that domain to one of my ecommerce pages that offers fast folding strollers.

The Gamble And The Payoff

I look at the $10 registration fee this way, and this is especially true with high commercial intent phrases: if the term gets just 300 searches per month and I can put it in the top 3 spots on the search engines with minimal effort for the longtail, then it’s fair to assume I can pull an extra 2 to 3 dozen possible buyers to my ecommerce page each month.

Being uber-conservative, lets say I only grab 10 potential buyers per month though. If I were using PPC marketing, and paying $0.10 per click to get qualified buyers (which usually cost more than $0.10 each if they’re really qualified), then that same 10 visitors would cost me $1 per month, or $12 per year.

So, in reality I just saved $2 per year from my marketing budget by buying this domain.

And like all marketing, the best laid plans don’t always work out. Sometimes something will go wrong in the research of a term, or the traffic won’t have the intent that I believed it would, and so I’ll own a domain that doesn’t lead to any traffic or conversions. It happens, but not often because I’m pretty thorough in my investigative work.

But Is That Whitehat? Is it Cybersquatting?

The truth is everyone seems to have their own definitions for these terms, and some “purists” will even say that just owning more than 1 domain is breaking some unwritten rule or code,  so I can’t answer that in a way that won’t make someone cry foul. But, in my opinion my method is completely “above board” because it connects searchers with what they’re looking for. I’m not taking advantage of incorrect spellings or piggy-backing (leeching) off of brand names, I look for longtail keyword terms that match what I’m offering, so that I can give searchers exactly what they’re looking for.

Like in my example above, someone searching for “fast folding stroller” hasn’t identified a specific brand or even retailer in their search, they simply want to find a fast folding stroller, so if I can connect them with my sales page offering that product it’s a win-win for both of us.

In Conclusion

Anyway, that’s the why and how behind my huge collection of domains that most true domainers would consider low-value. And they’d be right from their perspective where the value is often in the “parked domain” revenue potential.

But if you’ve got some good product(s) to sell, and earn a decent commission from each sale, then using additional domains to attract qualified leads can be a highly lucrative way to spend your marketing dollars.


Email this post Email this post

Technorati Tags: , ,

My Google Reader Shares – February 20, 2010

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

Email this post Email this post

Technorati Tags: ,

How Do You Approach Product Pricing?

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Nathan Hangen, co-author of the book “Beyond Blogging”, published a guest posting today over at howtomakemyblog.com which outlines some of the obstacles and backlash encountered when the book was launched (released).

It’s an interesting read, but there’s one area that Nathan touched on which really struck me and I thought would make an interesting post here where I could expand my thoughts on it as well.

In his posting, Nathan mentions that deciding on a price point for the book before launch was a hard task for he and his partner, and the price they decided on of $47 apparently also drove some of the backlash they received from “A-list Bloggers” when they launched.

Now, Nathan gives 3 very good reasons for pricing the book at $47.

1) A higher price point will attract more affiliates

If you’re selling a product online you had better have an army of aggressive affiliates out there selling for you or you’ll be lucky to earn enough money for a nice dinner at Olive Garden.

I don’t care how good you are, or how great your product is, or even how hard you’re willing to work–if you’re the only one on the web promoting your product you’re almost guaranteed to fail.

As a product owner, your job (once the product is ready) is really to sell your product as “marketable” to affiliates, gather as many of them as you can into your fold, and then let them sell to the end users. Having a higher (but fair) price point and affiliate payout is the best tool I know of for attracting more quality affiliates.

2) Product Value

The second great point Nathan made was on the value contained in the book. From the months of time spent researching and writing it to the insights added by multiple interviews with well known authority bloggers. For a blogging beginner, it sounds like this book (and I haven’t read it to be honest) would be a great reference and launchpad to get a new blog up and running in the right direction. If that’s the case, $47 seems to me like a very small price to pay for such a work.

3) Show buyers you’re offering a serious product

But Nathan’s third point, which he gave the briefest explanation on but I thought was the most important, is that if they had priced it lower then buyers/readers may have taken it less seriously.

That idea may sound like “marketing double-speak” on first glance, but it’s actually a notion that I’ve always taken to heart in every product I’ve ever created, and I do so for the consumer’s interests rather than my own.

Protect Your Customers from Themselves

Speaking from my own experience, I’ve never created a product that I didn’t believe was a serious and/or powerful tool or reference. However, at the same time I’ve never created an “easy button” product either, because I have yet to see one actually work.

For example, with my NIMS (Niche Instant Mashup Sites) scripts, I know the potential of using those scripts is huge (I use them myself) in terms of ranking well and earning revenues, but I also know that unless you invest a little effort to make the sites you build with them your own and a pleasing/valuable experience to your visitors then you won’t ever make a dime with them.

In other words, NIMS does the heavy lifting of creating niche sites, but the user still needs to do some obvious marketing and link building promotions to get traffic, otherwise the site will just sit quietly lost in the vacuum of cyberspace.

If I sold NIMS for $9.99 I know that I could easily multiply the number of sales I’ve had by a factor of 10 or more, but I also know that the majority of the people who purchased the scripts at that price would never bother to use them, or would try them but not invest the work needed to promote their NIMS sites.

Such is the prevailing mindset among those searching for the “easy button” on the cheap. They often waste their time and money moving from one thing to another looking for a magic bullet rather than learning to maximize the potential of what they get. This is the crowd (and behavior) that many “gurus” and “$7 Special Report” sellers earn their living from. They depend on the buyer who won’t actually try to use what they’re selling, or look ‘behind the curtain’ of their systems and tools.

In my mind, that is nothing but taking advantage of your customers. At the end of the day, I’m all about making a profit with my business, but I also want those profits to be earned, and unless my customers are gaining a true value from what they buy from me, I can’t feel like I’ve earned their dollars.

So, by pricing NIMS as I have, I know that the price point will turn away some less motivated buyers, but I also know that there’s a much better likelihood that those who do buy the scripts will be more inclined to make use of them and put in the  little necessary effort to get the most out of them.

Am I trading a some profits for a clear conscience? Probably, but then again maybe not. As was mentioned earlier, having a higher price point on a product attracts more affiliates to promote it for you, so at the end of the day I think the earnings are probably similar even though my pricing turns away many of the impulse buyers.

The bottom line for me is that this is my business and it carries my name, and I don’t take that lightly. In addition to earning a living, I intend to always be able to respect myself and what I do with it–and I believe my customers are better off and appreciative that I take that approach.


Email this post Email this post

Technorati Tags:

Need An Online Boost? Go Offline!

Monday, February 15th, 2010

Yes, the title is a cheap word-play with a double-take gotcha, but it’s honest and I can’t stress enough how much stepping away from the computer (and the Interwebs) helps me to regain clarity and focus from time to time, so I highly suggest anyone who feels like they’re running into the same brick walls over and over, or like they’re chasing their own tails.

The web is an amazing place, full of wonder and mystery, shiny objects and plenty of opportunity for all–but it’s also a maze that’s easy to become mentally lost in and once that happens, you probably aren’t doing yourself or your business any good at all.

Relating that to Internet marketing, the whole process of discovering niches to explore, keyword researching, market testing, offer tweaking, SERPs chasing…can quickly turn into a sort of “broken record” for those of us who do it daily. And if you don’t take a little step back once in a while, you’ll run the risk of burning out on all of it.

I’ve seen it happen. Dave Terson is a good friend of mine who was making serious bank online as an Internet marketer from about 2000 through 2004, then one day he just switched off all of his sites, closed all of his accounts and became a partner in a small restaurant (that doesn’t have a web page, and won’t as long as Dave is involved according to him).

Dave burned out hard. His was like a crash-and-burn without the crash part. He was working around the clock on his online business, developing ideas and products and sites all day, then working with overseas freelancers all night on various forms of content and product creation.

The dude was living on a couple of hours of sleep per night, drinking coffee by the pot rather than the cup, and so obsessed with growing his business (even though he was already beyond his own capacity) that he admits now there were times if he saw his daily income dip even slightly he would go into “bull mode” where he would go 2 or 3 days without sleep at all trying to figure out why his profits had dipped and how he could avoid it happening again.

Now, Dave is an extreme example, but I can relate to his condition (and possibly psychosis) and I bet most Internet marketers can as well.

Long, hard and sometimes boring strategy sessions or campaign analysis meetings that turn into marathons because there’s some tiny piece of the puzzle you’re sure you’re missing…most of us have been there.

A chance conversation with a friend or partner that turns into a 3 day competition of spit-balling ideas, most of us have done it.

And sometimes those “lost weekends” (or chunks of week days) can be fruitful and profitable, there’s no denying that. One of my most profitable ventures ever was a software title I created only after spending 2 days with a friend trying to make an existing piece of software do what we wanted it to, to the point that we became so frustrated with the existing application that we decided to start from scratch and write our own.

The resulting software we created did everything we needed, quickly became popular with a lot of other webmasters and site owners, and we ultimately sold it to a start up software company for a large chunk of cash.

It all came from one of those long, marathon sessions. So, they can be productive. But most of the time, and I’m speaking from my own experience here, they’re just long and ultimately useless as the ideas and plans you make during them often turn out to be more rambling than this post may seem to be.

So, when I feel or seem stuck, or sense myself becoming a little frazzled with the tail chasing, I don’t hesitate to just walk away from the computer and do something completely unrelated to work or the world wide web.

From spending time with friends and family to puttering in my yard or garden, I just force myself to not think about work or whatever problem is at hand for me.

And more often than not, out of nowhere inspiration or an answer to my problem will hit me over the head, and that’s when I know I’m ready to get back to work. And even though I’ve shown an example above of how I made a nice profit from an idea born of long session-ing, the truth is overall I’ve come up with far more profitable ideas while weeding my garden than I have sitting at my monitor.

Try it the next time you feel stuck or run down, it works for me and it might just help you find a little clarity and focus too.


Email this post Email this post

Technorati Tags: , , ,